Sammy Bilton is a dedicated Trainee Solicitor with a keen focus on Prison Law, Community Care, Actions Against Public Bodies, and Discrimination. Sammy’s commitment to advocating for justice and equality drives him to provide exceptional legal services and support to his clients.
With a background that combines rigorous academic training and practical experience, Sammy brings a thorough understanding of the complexities involved in his areas of practice. He is passionate about ensuring that his clients’ rights are protected and that they receive the best possible representation.
Outside of his professional life, Sammy is an avid runner and hiker, finding joy in exploring the great outdoors. He also enjoys unwinding with trips to the cinema, appreciating the art of storytelling and film.
LO v GMMHNHSFT
Obtained £2500 in damages for our client, who sent a letter to his previous psychiatrist, explaining his mental health decline due to the stresses and trauma of being in the failing prison estate. This letter was then shared by a member of the Defendant’s staff in a group chat, mocking the contents of his letter and his mental decline. This breach was reported, and damages were obtained reflecting the breach of our client’s DPA rights and Human Rights under Article 8.
SR v MoJ
Secured a payment of damages totalling £2400 for client who was not taken to the funeral of his father, despite consistent reassurances from the prison that this would take place.
MW v MoJ
Obtained a damages payment for client after he was falsely imprisoned for upwards of 72 hours in prison, due to staff not being available to release him over the weekend.
SB v MoJ
Obtained £7000+ in damages for client who as a Jewish prisoner, was not provided with a full kosher diet for over 12 months. This was aggravated by the fact that the client was forced to demonstrate the veracity of his faith, which prisoners of other religious groups were not required to do.
TO v MoJ
Obtained £3250 damages for client whose parole review was delayed for five months through no fault of his own. This delay was caused by professionals failing to submit reports relating to his parole review in a timely fashion, despite the client being suitable for release into the community.
JY v SSJ
Sammy pursued a judicial review against the SSJ on an emergency basis when it became apparent that they were not willing to take action to ensure client was able to attend his mother’s funeral. After issuing proceedings at the High Court, the client received assurances that he would be taken to his mother’s funeral on escort.
Comments by Clients
“Sammy is a diamond of a caseworker the best I have ever seen.”
